The Hearing Day has Finally Arrived!
June 28 and 29th at 10am.
Zoom Coordinates at the bottom of the post.
The evidence that led me to oppose the government mandates has been fortified over the last few months. Since November, the issues with the PCR test and the data around asymptomatic transmission, ICU admissions and mortality has been solidified through Freedom of Information Requests and in international court rulings. The evidence on this Constitutional Challenge is absolutely STACKED in our favour. So much so, that the Crown Attorneys have abandoned all scientific arguments.
Other jurisdictions around the country have seen narrower challenges fail, where the applicants have holes in the evidentiary record. For instance, a federal challenge brought by the JCCF recently failed because while PCR was exposed, “VOC’s” were not, and the judge had no choice but to rule for the government. Not so on our challenge- we have them surrounded.
Check this out- the Crown thinks the reports brought by six well-qualified experts are “superfluous” and “vexatious”. What is this, China? The Soviet Union? With their literally infinite resources, they couldn’t find any experts to rebut our arguments? We don’t have standing to bring a challenge this strong because… It’s annoying?
“In their factum, the Respondents seek to impugn the entirety of Ontario’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The actual scope of this proceeding is much more limited. (…) All of the Respondents’ many and far-fetched grievances about vaccines, PCR testing, hydroxychloroquine, stay-at-home orders, purported cost-benefit calculations, herd immunity, and the World Health Organization – among many other such topics – are superfluous to this proceeding; indeed, they are vexatious. (…) While the Respondents are entitled to their opinions, their “disdain for the legislation [is not] a sufficient direct interest to meet the test for the granting of standing to challenge in this proceeding the validity of the entire provincial legislative response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
THE EVIDENCIARY RECORD IS STACKED IN OUR FAVOUR.
We brought 11 expert reports, the Crown brought 1.
We made 5 charter arguments, the Crown responded to 1.
We made use of every page of factum allowance, the crown left 15 pages empty.
It’s clear that the Crown will rely on procedural BS or a biased judge for a favourable ruling.
In totally unrelated news, we had a judge switcheroo midway through this challenge! We were told it was a scheduling issue, before we got to schedule anything. Later we received an email showing it was an administrative issue. Coincidence, I’m sure!
My lawyers tell me that the courts tend to rule with public opinion. While the tides are turning, the media won’t report any counter-narrative, so much of the public consciousness in Canada is still blanketed by fear. I’ve done the best I can to disseminate this information, the rest is up to us on the big day.
There is a rally June 28 at 10am at Nathan Phillips Square to make our presence felt. You can attend the ZOOM hearing so the judiciary can see how many eyes are watching this case. You can share this information with your friends, and be comforted knowing that the TRUTH and SCIENCE is on our side.
The government-funded media outlets WILL NOT REPORT on this challenge, despite taking every opportunity to cover my arrest, my licensing issues, and the endless fines and charges I received. How messed up is that?
Alternately, call-in using these credentials:
Canada Toll-free: 855 703 8985
Meeting ID: 678 4656 2978